The idea for this bibliography came about during 2014-2015 as the Digital Humanities Special Interest Groups were being formed in the Visual Resources Association and the Art Libraries Society of North America. With the recent flurry of publications in the digital humanities over the past five years, and increasing interest in digital humanities in academic disciplines, a comprehensive bibliography seemed all the more important.
Since neither SIG decided to pursue the project, John Taormina, director of the Visual Media Center in the Department of Art, Art History & Visual Studies at Duke University, and one of the founders of both SIGs, began developing the bibliography in earnest during the 2017-18 academic year. Work continued over the course of three semesters with the assistance of Duke students for data entry. During that time one undergraduate, Michael O’Sullivan, and two doctoral students, Katherine McCusker and Alex Strecker, contributed to the project.
Various bibliographies from digital humanities publications (books and journals) were identified, selected, and collated into this new bibliography. The first version of this document was released in February 2019 at 149 pages. Additions to this type of compilation are ongoing and updates will be released quarterly. A filterable online version is in development.
Currently, the bibliography is being re-organized under categories such as art, art history, archaeology, and other disciplines; apps and software; data visualization, text mining, and databases; computational media, 3D modeling, and gaming; and other areas that fall under the digital humanities rubric.
The bibliography is available via the Duke Wired! Digital Art History & Visual Culture website: dukewired.org
In a new article in Computers in Libraries (Jan./Feb. 2017), “Top Tools for Digital Humanities Research,” Nancy K. Herther, reviews some of the best free and open source tools available today. Among those reviewed are Voyant Tools, Umigon,Prism, and Sophie. Herther also provides a list of tools arranged by function with sections for Digital Humanities Toolkits, Timeline Tools, and Data Visualization.
Another suggested resource for an in-depth look at tools is the DiRT Directory, a registry of digital research tools for scholarly use. Entries may be viewed by function and the registry offers ways to drill down by platform, cost, license, and type of data or object.
Do you have a favorite resource for learning about new tools, or finding those that best answer a particular need?
We’re nearly at the half-way point of the year! That means I’ve got lots of links to share in this round-up.
Helen D. Wall’s “120KMOMA Peak Years” article on medium.com featured some good visualizations using MOMA’s collection data from Github. What I liked about her article was how achievable these visualizations are (you could generate something similar, though maybe not as lovely, using Viewshare, for example) as well as her very helpful and digestible comments on data cleanup.
Digitizing Special Formats wiki brought to you by the Digital Library Federation: “Rather than providing comprehensive coverage, this list includes introductory and reference materials that are good places to begin an exploration of issues of broad import to digitizing cultural heritage materials.” Also good research for writing a grant.
It has been nearly three weeks since our joint DH SIG meeting in Seattle with our VRA colleagues. There were around 70 in attendance! Our conversation was full of ideas for supporting each other in our DH efforts, ways to communicate, and perhaps most significantly, to collaborate.
Guidance on preservation of DH research data and projects was identified as an area needing attention.
A SIG-fascilitated practicum was suggested where a group could work together on data sets using a variety of tools.
A DH Slack channel got many thumbs-up as a way to stay in touch.
Creating a knowledge base of SIG members with particular skills was also popular.
A list of MOOCs that offer relevant DH skills (Udacity was mentioned for programming languages) would be helpful.
Resources on project management would be useful. (A plug for SEI this summer which will include project management as part of the curriculum.)
A list of DH projects that SIG members are currently engaged in or have recently completed both to showcase our efforts and to serve as a resource.
Lastly, there was enthusiasm for ARLIS/NA DH SIG and the VRA DH SIG working together, either officially or unofficially. Duplicating efforts and splitting resources is inefficient and the meeting showed great camaraderie and interest in collaboration.
Using the communication channels we have established at this time- our blog, listserv (dh-sig [at] arlisna.org) and @arlisdhsig– let’s keep the conversations going. If you want any of these ideas prioritized or want to take the lead on something, say so! Progress on these issues will be posted here. Thanks to all of you who attended, and to those of you who didn’t but have expressed interest in our SIG. We’ve got a really healthy membership and we’re positioned to do some great work in the next year!
DHCommons Journal is asking for submissions of “procedural descriptions” of stable and publicly available digital humanities projects. For those who submit, this is a great opportunity to highlight an accomplishment and to share your experience with the field. For the rest of us, these promise to be a good source of instruction and inspiration.
Submission deadline April 1, 2016 (presumably not an April Fools joke…)
Recently, three opportunities for professional development have been announced, all taking place on the east coast.
VRAF is presenting a one day Omeka workshop at Hunter College, Exhibit, Instruct, Promote: An Introduction to Omeka for Digital Scholarship, on February 19, 9:00-4:00. The workshop will be taught by Meghan Musolff, Special Projects Librarian for Library IT, University of Michigan Library, where she has used Omeka in the creation of online exhibits. The fee for this workshop is $125 and registration is required before February 12.
Finally, the Summer Education Institute has been announced for 2016. It will be held at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, June 7-10. The curriculum has been updated and includes a component on digital humanities projects. The institute is a rare immersive opportunity to develop new skills or deepen existing ones. Payment must be received before June 1.
ARLIS/NA and VRA are heading to Seattle, March 8-12, 2016 for another joint annual conference. Here are the programming events that are likely to offer the most to those attendees looking to expand their digital humanities toolbox.
THATCamp – a pre-conference event on Tuesday, March 8, 8am-5pm. Registration is closed, but there will be a blog to record activity and a recap will be offered at the joint DH SIG meeting.
By popular demand, ARLIS/NA and VRA are offering an opportunity for conference attendees to participate in a THATCamp (The Technology and Humanities Camp). Details can be found here. Be sure to apply before November 13 as attendance is capped at 75.
What’s a THATCamp? Watch this friendly intro to the idea from Amanda French.
There have been a lot of job announcements in the last couple of months from libraries looking for digital humanities professionals. It makes me wonder, what is the background and what are the skills for a DH position in libraries?
Four of five postings are looking for an MLS/MLIS.
Four of the five postings use the word “collaborate” or “collaborative”.
Four of the five postings want someone with experience with Omeka.
Four of the five postings include traditional librarian duties such as reference, collection development and instruction.
Three of the five postings use the word “creative”, and use it in the first sentence.
Three of the five postings specify experience with WordPress.
Two of the five postings specify experience with metadata standards.
Two of the five postings include digital exhibitions in the duties.
Two of the five postings reference creating or managing digital collections.
Two of the five postings specify working with digital assets.
Two of the five postings mention working with archives collections.
One of the five postings wants familiarity with database structure.
One of the five postings wants experience with digital publishing.
One of the five postings specifies information visualization in the job description.
One of the five postings specifies working with images or media.
One of the five postings asks for management experience.
None of the jobs mention cataloging, RDA, or MARC.
How many jobs want which programming skills? XML/XSL (4), HTML (2), CSS (2), PHP (2), Python (2)
Do you find these elements surprising? Do these some of these specifications sound unfamiliar to you or in line with skills you have been developing? Are there skills that a DH professional in an art library or museum would need in particular that aren’t listed here?